There isn't a lot of analysis that can be done after today's game. Put pretty simply the Browns are bad...really bad. Joshua Cribbs is regarded by many as their best player. If he were on the Packer's roster he'd be a return guy and he wouldn't sniff the field on offense.
We will say this:
Jennings is turning into a diva and it's sad.
Hawk and Grant seemed to play better, but again the quality of opponent was questionable so it's pretty hard to call.
The Browns are bad, but it seemed like Flynn did an okay job in garbage time.
Penalties continue to be killer. The twelve men on the field was unacceptable. Atari Bigby also had a brain fart when he shouldered Jerome Harrison out of bounds after the whistle blew. Against the Browns a lot flies. When Derek Anderson is the opposing QB giving him another opportunity isn't a huge deal. When AP and Brett Favre are your opponent giving them more opportunities will kill you.
Check back for Packer Vikings preview.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
The Big Show to the Big GB?
A reader sent us a text asking us to examine an interesting topic. Suppose the pocket from which Aaron Rodgers throws continues to collapse, penalties continue to pile up, the Packers miss the playoffs, and MM gets an AK (ass kicking) out of town.
Who replaces him?
Our reader was hopeful it would be Mike Holmgren. We like the Walrus as much as the next guy however several points block his entry firm returning to the sideline in Green Bay.
1.) Holmgren will want say in the draft....that's why he left GB in the first place.
Ripping control of the draft day war room out of TT's control is like ripping a loaded shot gun out of Charleton Heston's cold dead fingers. Our guess is TT spends his free time in the war room evaluated film by flash light...or maybe even candle light.
2.) Holmgren will demand a lot of money. TT has shown the characteristics of a value investor. It doesn't seem like he'd throw the Walrus $7-8 million/year when he won't pay a premium to protect Aaron Rodgers.
Good thought on Walrus, but if MM gets replaced (which could happen if pad level doesn't improve) it's likely it'll be a little known name in a continued trend for cheap labor.
Who replaces him?
Our reader was hopeful it would be Mike Holmgren. We like the Walrus as much as the next guy however several points block his entry firm returning to the sideline in Green Bay.
1.) Holmgren will want say in the draft....that's why he left GB in the first place.
Ripping control of the draft day war room out of TT's control is like ripping a loaded shot gun out of Charleton Heston's cold dead fingers. Our guess is TT spends his free time in the war room evaluated film by flash light...or maybe even candle light.
2.) Holmgren will demand a lot of money. TT has shown the characteristics of a value investor. It doesn't seem like he'd throw the Walrus $7-8 million/year when he won't pay a premium to protect Aaron Rodgers.
Good thought on Walrus, but if MM gets replaced (which could happen if pad level doesn't improve) it's likely it'll be a little known name in a continued trend for cheap labor.
Hawk on the move ???
With a cap number of over $10 million dollars next year and dwindling production AJ Hawk's future should certainly be questioned. The New England Patriots figure to be an interested party. With Teddy Brushchi's retirement, the trade of Mike Vrabel, the signing of 65 year old Junior Seau, and the healthy scratch Adalius Thomas this past Sunday it appears as if the Pats have a lot of moving and shaking taking place at line backer position. In addition Hawk draws parallels to Vrabel. Before signing with the Patriots Vrabel was a reserve with the Pittsburgh and his talent was largely undetected. It was after signing with the Patriots in 2001 that Vrabel's career took off.
The Hoody has a known affinity for guys that show attention to detail, eat sleep and drink football, and play with consistency. During his time as a Packer Hawk did what was asked of him and nothing more. He didn't give up big plays but he never made plays either leading to widespread fan disappointment.
The Hoody has a known affinity for guys that show attention to detail, eat sleep and drink football, and play with consistency. During his time as a Packer Hawk did what was asked of him and nothing more. He didn't give up big plays but he never made plays either leading to widespread fan disappointment.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Lions Review
A win is a win, but the Lions are terrible and they got to Rodgers 4 times. As I see it today marked a point in time where a couple of Packer players are at cross-roads.
Chad Clifton-In his time with the Packers Chad Clifton toughed out a lot of injuries and played through a lot of pain. When I think of Clifton I think smart tough player. What I saw today was neither....it was like his head wasn't in the game. Playing through the pain might be at the point where it's unbearable. Watching Clifton grimace as he walked off the field today was sad. His contract is up after this year and he looks to be spent at this point.
AJ Hawk-When asked about the impact Hawk has had Ted Thompson has said it's unfair for fans to expect Super Man. Is anyone else sick of the Packer's organization sticking up for Hawk by saying, "He's doing what we ask of him." He's the 5th pick in the draft. The 5th pick in the draft needs to do more than what's being asked of him. The 5th pick in the draft needs to make some plays. Hawk's cap number in excess of $10 million. We have a feeling that is going to be reworked as Hawk's role is reduced in the defense.
MM-When MM came to GB he was touted as being Pittsburgh Macho and said he wanted to establish an identity as a team that had a physical running presence. After three seasons this hasn't turned out. In addition the Packers are a heavily penalized team. We can stomach the Woodson Harris roughness penalties but the illegal formations, false starts, and lining up off sides are on the coach.
What is MM's signature at this point other than a Sharpie Marker sticking out of the back of his hat? Holmgren instilled discipline, the West Coast offense, and made a couple trips to the Super Bowl. Sherman brought a solid running game to GB using U-71. What has MM done to define himself? The rest of the season will be telling.
Chad Clifton-In his time with the Packers Chad Clifton toughed out a lot of injuries and played through a lot of pain. When I think of Clifton I think smart tough player. What I saw today was neither....it was like his head wasn't in the game. Playing through the pain might be at the point where it's unbearable. Watching Clifton grimace as he walked off the field today was sad. His contract is up after this year and he looks to be spent at this point.
AJ Hawk-When asked about the impact Hawk has had Ted Thompson has said it's unfair for fans to expect Super Man. Is anyone else sick of the Packer's organization sticking up for Hawk by saying, "He's doing what we ask of him." He's the 5th pick in the draft. The 5th pick in the draft needs to do more than what's being asked of him. The 5th pick in the draft needs to make some plays. Hawk's cap number in excess of $10 million. We have a feeling that is going to be reworked as Hawk's role is reduced in the defense.
MM-When MM came to GB he was touted as being Pittsburgh Macho and said he wanted to establish an identity as a team that had a physical running presence. After three seasons this hasn't turned out. In addition the Packers are a heavily penalized team. We can stomach the Woodson Harris roughness penalties but the illegal formations, false starts, and lining up off sides are on the coach.
What is MM's signature at this point other than a Sharpie Marker sticking out of the back of his hat? Holmgren instilled discipline, the West Coast offense, and made a couple trips to the Super Bowl. Sherman brought a solid running game to GB using U-71. What has MM done to define himself? The rest of the season will be telling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)